[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e53a2157-9a9e-2a84-02af-d4f0a92e7bea@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:40:46 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] dt-bindings: mux-adg792a: document devicetree
bindings for ADG792A/G mux
On 27/01/17 22:09, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-01-27 20:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Analog Devices ADG792A/G is a triple 4:1 mux.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-adg792a.txt | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-adg792a.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-adg792a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-adg792a.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0b26dd11f070
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-adg792a.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>>> +Bindings for Analog Devices ADG792A/G Triple 4:1 Multiplexers
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : "adi,adg792a" or "adi,adg792g"
>>> +- #mux-control-cells : <0> if parallel, or <1> if not.
>>> +* Standard mux-controller bindings as decribed in mux-controller.txt
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties for ADG792G:
>>> +- gpio-controller : if present, #gpio-cells below is required.
>>> +- #gpio-cells : should be <2>
>>> + - First cell is the GPO line number, i.e. 0 or 1
>>> + - Second cell is used to specify active high (0)
>>> + or active low (1)
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- adi,parallel : if present, the three muxes are bound together with a single
>>> + mux controller, controlling all three muxes in parallel.
>>
>> Can't this be implied by #mux-control-cells == 0?
>
> Right, good point! I'll drop adi,parallel.
>
>>> +- adi,idle-state : if present, array of 2-tuples with mux controller number
>>> + and state that mux controllers will have when idle. States 0 through 3
>>> + correspond to signals A through D in the datasheet.
>>> +- adi,idle-high-impedance : if present, array of mux controller numbers that
>>> + should be in the disconnected high-impedance state when idle.
>>
>> Perhaps combine these 2 to a common idle-state with the index being the
>> mux controller number and a value of -1 (or 4) being hi-Z.
>
> At one point [1] I had a straight array for the mux controllers with state 4
> being hi-Z and state 5 being the default "leave mux as-is on release", but
> Jonathan didn't like magic numbers. Can you please read the follow-ups to the
> referenced mail for some background, and then pick out the most suitable color
> for me to paint with? :-)
Hohum. Given it can be cleanly represented as two properties rather than a single
property with a single magic value alongside the obvious ones I asked Peter
to split it.
Not all that fussed though as I don't have to maintain this ;)
*ducks*
Jonathan
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/30/110
>
>>> +
>>> +Mux controller states 0 through 3 correspond to signals A through D in the
>>> +datasheet. If a mux controller is mentioned in neither adi,idle-state nor
>>> +adi,idle-high-impedance it is left in its previously selected state when idle.
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Three independent mux controllers (of which one is used).
>>> + * Mux 0 is disconnected when idle, mux 1 idles with signal C
>>> + * and mux 2 idles with signal A.
>>> + */
>>> + &i2c0 {
>>> + mux: adg792a@50 {
>>
>> mux-controller@50
>
> Yep. Hmm, where have I seen that before? :-)
>
> Cheers,
> peda
>
>>> + compatible = "adi,adg792a";
>>> + reg = <0x50>;
>>> + #mux-control-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + adi,idle-high-impedance = <0>;
>>> + adi,idle-state = <1 2>, <2 0>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + adc-mux {
>>> + compatible = "io-channel-mux";
>>> + io-channels = <&adc 0>;
>>> + io-channel-names = "parent";
>>> +
>>> + mux-controls = <&mux 1>;
>>> +
>>> + channels = "sync-1", "", "out";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Three parallel muxes with one mux controller, useful e.g. if
>>> + * the adc is differential, thus needing two signals to be muxed
>>> + * simultaneously for correct operation.
>>> + */
>>> + &i2c0 {
>>> + pmux: adg792a@50 {
>>> + compatible = "adi,adg792a";
>>> + reg = <0x50>;
>>> + #mux-control-cells = <0>;
>>> + adi,parallel;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + diff-adc-mux {
>>> + compatible = "io-channel-mux";
>>> + io-channels = <&adc 0>;
>>> + io-channel-names = "parent";
>>> +
>>> + mux-controls = <&pmux>;
>>> +
>>> + channels = "sync-1", "", "out";
>>> + };
>>> --
>>> 2.1.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists