[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170129151903.v7mpbwqxll4ho73v@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:19:04 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@....de,
tpmdd@...horst.net, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] enhance TPM 2.0 extend function to support
multiple PCR banks
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:53:11PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 01/26/2017 02:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:05:11PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > IMA extends its hash measurements in the TPM PCRs, based on policy.
> > > The existing in-kernel TPM extend function extends only the SHA1
> > > PCR bank. TPM 2.0 defines multiple PCR banks, to support different
> > > hash algorithms. The TCG TPM 2.0 Specification[1] recommends
> > > extending all active PCR banks to prevent malicious users from
> > > setting unused PCR banks with fake measurements and quoting them.
> > > This patch set adds support for extending all active PCR banks,
> > > as recommended.
> > >
> > > The first patch implements the TPM 2.0 capability to retrieve
> > > the list of active PCR banks.
> > >
> > > The second patch modifies the tpm_pcr_extend() and tpm2_pcr_extend()
> > > interface to support extending multiple PCR banks. The existing
> > > tpm_pcr_extend() interface expects only a SHA1 digest. Hence, to
> > > extend all active PCR banks with differing digest sizes for TPM 2.0,
> > > the SHA1 digest is padded with 0's as needed.
> > >
> > > [1] TPM 2.0 Specification referred here is "TCG PC Client Specific
> > > Platform Firmware Profile for TPM 2.0"
> >
> > I pushed these patches. I had to resolve merge conflicts caused
> > by the min_rsp_body_length parameter in tpm_transmit_cmd. Can you
> > verify that I didn't break anything?
> >
>
> Yes, it looks fine, also tested with it.
>
> Just to understand.. how did you decide min_rsp_body_length to be 9.
> If I understood correctly, I think it is the size after header, till last
> fixed parameter i.e. till count.
> Is the assumption is that count can be zero, such that there is no active
> bank for PCR and so no struct tpm2_pcr_selection ?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> - Nayna
Hmm.. I got it from "marker = &buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9];" i.e. must
have at last 9 bytes after the header.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists