lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:24:31 +0000
From:   "Liang, Kan" <>
To:     'Peter Zijlstra' <>
CC:     "" <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] perf,core: use parent avg sample period as child
 initial period

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:21:02AM -0500, wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <>
> >
> > perf brings additional overhead when monitoring the task which
> > frequently generates child task.
> >
> > When inheriting a event from parent task to child task, the
> > sample_period of original parent event (parent_event->parent) will be
> > assigned to child event as its initial period, which is usually the
> > default sample_period 1.
> Why is that mostly 1? I would expect the parent event's sample_period to
> ramp up as well.

The conclusion is based on the observation in the specific test case
mentioned in the description. The sample_period is for the original parent
event (parent_event->parent), not the direct parent.

I did several tests these days, it can be 100% reproduced by this particular
test case in multiplexing.
I think the reason is that the original parent event is scheduled out shortly
and never gets a chance to trigger interrupt in the first round. So its
sample_period doesn't get updated. Then the test case repeatedly
generates child tasks and child events. The new child events will be
scheduled in/out continually. The original parent event never gets a
change to be scheduled again. So the original parent event's
sample_period is kept1.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists