linux-kernel - [PATCH 20/60] staging: lustre: llite: remove obsolete comment for ll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1485648328-2141-21-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:04:48 -0500
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 20/60] staging: lustre: llite: remove obsolete comment for ll_unlink()

From: "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>

Remove obsolete comments about the behavior of ll_unlink()

Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@...el.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8003
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/19881
Reviewed-by: Andrew Perepechko <andrew.perepechko@...gate.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@...oo.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index f925656..fc17654 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -994,11 +994,6 @@ static int ll_create_nd(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-/* ll_unlink() doesn't update the inode with the new link count.
- * Instead, ll_ddelete() and ll_d_iput() will update it based upon if there
- * is any lock existing. They will recycle dentries and inodes based upon locks
- * too. b=20433
- */
 static int ll_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dchild)
 {
 	struct ptlrpc_request *request = NULL;
-- 
1.8.3.1