[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130064521.GC4324@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:45:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@...sung.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.shailesh@...sung.com,
ashish.kalra@...sung.com,
Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Usb: host - Fix possible NULL derefrence.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:36:29AM +0530, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> of_device_get_match_data could return NULL, and so can cause
> a NULL pointer dereference later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> index a59fafb..890c778 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,10 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> tegra->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!tegra->soc) {
How would the driver be loaded and the probe function called if this
returns NULL?
Is this ever possible?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists