[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130090636.GA29062@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:06:36 +0100
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...sung.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AMAN DEEP <aman.deep@...sung.com>,
HEMANSHU SRIVASTAVA <hemanshu.s@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH v1] USB:Core: BugFix: Proper handling of Race
Condition when two USB class drivers try to call init_usb_class
simultaneously
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:25:25AM +0000, Ajay Kaher wrote:
>
First off, you are sending html email, which the mailing list keeps
rejecting, why are you ignoring that?
>
> There is race condition when two USB class drivers try to call
>
> init_usb_class at the same time and leads to crash.
>
>
>
> The main reason for this is one of the Class drivers allocates memory
> for usb_class structure and initializes its member. In the meantime NULL
> check for usb_class structure fails and assumes that usb_class structure
> is properly initialized and crashed while trying to access its members.
>
>
>
> To avoid this race condition locking required before calling
> init_usb_class from function usb_register_dev.
>
>
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher
Does this look correct? Please work with some of the samsung kernel
developers for how to properly submit a patch.
And finally, how are two drivers calling init_usb_class() at the same
time? What code path causes that? Have you seen this happen, and if
so, what drivers caused it?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists