[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130204102.423cebea@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:41:02 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: sort Kconfig selects under CONFIG_PPC
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:30:02 +1100 Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com> wrote:
>
> config PPC has a lot of selects under it. They're not sorted in any
> particular order, leading to merge conflicts when adding items at the end.
>
> Sort them alphabetically.
Excellent, thanks.
> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
> ---
>
> On top of linux-next 20170130
Probably best done on top of powerpc-next and I can cope with the
conflicts one more time.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 689cf9218b21..570195c8a86a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -80,91 +80,91 @@ config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
> config PPC
Could we add a comment just above asking that the selects be kept in order?
> bool
> default y
> - select BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT
> + select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
> + select ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists