[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130104218.34zftrdyr3m6422w@lukather>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:42:18 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Enable MMC support
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 08:44:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a new attempt at getting the MMC controllers running, following the
> > work done by Andre.
> >
> > This has been tested on a board with one SDIO device (a Marvell WiFi chip)
> > and a Kingston eMMC with 1.8V IOs.
> >
> > For SDIO, the HS DDR mode works just fine. That serie also enables the
> > SDR104 mode to work on the devices that are capable of this.
> >
> > For the eMMC, HS200 with the voltage switch works. HS400 doesn't at the
> > moment, but since it's significantly more complex, and at the same time
> > Allwinner recommends to limit its frequency to 100MHz, this doesn't have
> > any benefits. If there's any at some point, this can be added later.
>
> Whole series is
>
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> Seems that we don't need to increase the signal drive strength for eMMC
> on the A64? This is probably a good thing.
From what I've seen, Allwinner still recommends using a 30mA drive
strength, so that doesn't seem needed.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists