[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130105156.GA6881@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:51:56 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@...el.com>,
Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 60/60] staging: lustre: libcfs: fix minimum size check
for libcfs ioctl
It looks like what happened is there were two patches applied out of
sync. Let's add a fixes tag and CC the original author.
Fixes: ed2f549dc0f6 ("staging: lustre: libcfs: test if userland data is to small")
This patch was probably correct when it was written but commit
1290932728e5 ("staging: lustre: Dynamic LNet Configuration (DLC) IOCTL
changes") ended up getting applied first so the size was wrong.
The lstcon_ioctl_entry() function doesn't have enough size checking.
Also I'm uncomfortable with:
data = container_of(hdr, struct libcfs_ioctl_data, ioc_hdr);
If hdr isn't the first member of the struct then the code is broken but
container_of() implies that that isn't a hard requirement. It should
just be:
data = (struct libcfs_ioctl_data *)hdr;
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists