linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/14] ASoC: sunxi: simplify optional reset handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:45:50 +0100
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
        Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] ASoC: sunxi: simplify optional reset handling

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 12:30 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:41:16PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really
> > optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe
> > optional, non-present reset controls.
> 
> I've only got this patch from the series, what's the story with
> dependencies and so on?

This is a cleanup series across subsystems. The referenced commit is the
only dependency, it only just got merged into the arm-soc tree. There
are no dependencies between patches of this series.

I could merge this through the reset tree with your acks or resend it
individually once the above commit hits mainline, whichever you prefer.

regards
Philipp