[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485783950.2877.21.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:45:50 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] ASoC: sunxi: simplify optional reset handling
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 12:30 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:41:16PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really
> > optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe
> > optional, non-present reset controls.
>
> I've only got this patch from the series, what's the story with
> dependencies and so on?
This is a cleanup series across subsystems. The referenced commit is the
only dependency, it only just got merged into the arm-soc tree. There
are no dependencies between patches of this series.
I could merge this through the reset tree with your acks or resend it
individually once the above commit hits mainline, whichever you prefer.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists