lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130143223.GC2669@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:32:24 +0100
From:   Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cputime: Convert core use of cputime_t to nsecs

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE have new cputime_t to nsecs conversion
> on cputime accounting path. But this should be leveraged by the recent
> changes which delay the cputime accounting to tick and context switch. 

I think it would be worth to mention that there are other drawbacks on
32bit architectures that use cputime-jiffies currently, like:
- cache utilization will be worse
- conversion cputime_to_jiffies() and cputime_to_clock_t() (with HZ == USER_HS)
  will no longer be an no-op
- to keep values consistent will need to add protection of u64 store/load,
  which will create additional performance costs

Stanislaw

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ