[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0df054a3-a0bf-7691-4546-4710bc8f32ce@st.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:55:02 +0100
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add STM32F469 pinctrl and fix issues in STM32 pinctrl
Hi,
On 01/27/2017 05:15 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> This series adds support of a dedicated driver for STM32F469 MCU pinctroller.
> This add generates some changes inside STM32 pinctrl driver and inside STM32
> device tree.
>
> Changes in STM32 pinctrl driver:
> -------------------------------
>
> - Add STM32F469 driver.
>
> - Change STM32 pinctrl core in order to use "gpio-ranges" devicetree definitions.
> Indeed, on STM32F469 there an hole in BANK J. We need to declare a gpio-ranges
> in gpioj controller node to handle this hole.
>
> Changes in STM32 device tree:
> ----------------------------
> I propose a new architecture (a new file split) for pinmux definition:
>
> - Create a common stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi for pinmuxing definitions
> which are common between STM32F429 and STM32F469 MCU.
>
> - Create dedicated stm32fxxx-pinctrl.dtsi file for each MCU
> (stm32f429-pinctrl.dtsi and stm32f469-pinctrl.dtsi) each one will
> include stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi. All differences (pinmuxing or GPIO
> bank holes) will be put inside the dedicated files.
>
> This series fix a locking issue when a gpio is used as IRQ.
>
> Regards
> Alex
>
> Alexandre TORGUE (8):
> pinctrl: stm32: fix bad location of gpiochip_lock_as_irq
> pinctrl: stm32: use gpio-ranges to declare bank range
I just see typo issue in patch 1&2. I will send a V2 when more review
will be done.
Regards
Alex
> Documentation: dt: Add bindings for STM32 pinctrl
> includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings
> pinctrl: stm32: Add STM32F469 MCU support
> Documentation: dt: Add new compatible to STM32 pinctrl driver bindings
> ARM: Kconfig: Introduce MACH_STM32F469 flag
> ARM: dts: stm32: create dedicated files for pinctrl definitions
>
> .../bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.txt | 57 +-
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 196 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-pinctrl.dtsi | 106 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 153 --
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-pinctrl.dtsi | 107 ++
> drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig | 6 +
> drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 129 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32f469.c | 1574 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f4-pinfunc.h | 1302 ++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h | 1239 ---------------
> 15 files changed, 3414 insertions(+), 1464 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32f469.c
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f4-pinfunc.h
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists