[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e608c76ea40e4f0d50bfe821174dfebef924e35b.1485750547.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:59:57 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START
(which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting
ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0"
check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except
CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all.
Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core,
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or
CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block
to make sure we don't ignore any such events.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
V1->V2:
- Improved changelog
- Don't move the first if block to a later point, as it becomes useless
then.
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index f0b4a981b8d3..18b72eec3507 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct acpi_processor *pr;
unsigned int ppc = 0;
- if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) {
+ if (ignore_ppc < 0)
ignore_ppc = 0;
- return 0;
- }
if (ignore_ppc)
return 0;
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists