linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: intel: Add support for hardware debouncer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170130153857.GN17297@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:38:57 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E . Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: intel: Add support for hardware debouncer

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The next generation Intel GPIO hardware has two additional registers
> > PADCFG2 and PADCFG3. The latter is marked as reserved but the former
> > includes configuration for per-pad hardware debouncer.
> >
> > This patch adds support for that in the Intel pinctrl core driver. Since
> > these are additional features on top of the current generation hardware,
> > we use revision number and feature flags to enable this if detected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> 
> Patch applied no matter what the build robot says.
> Days like these it is like C-3PO.

Thanks!

> This ended up really pretty I think, didn't it? :)

Totally agree. Thanks for the suggestion :)