[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0f9a927-2620-dea7-8038-bc1bc78107a4@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:36:20 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz, mgorman@...e.de,
minchan@...nel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jglisse@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 05/12] cpuset: Add cpuset_inc() inside cpuset_init()
On 01/29/2017 07:35 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Currently cpusets_enabled() wrongfully returns 0 even if we have a root
> cpuset configured on the system. This got missed when jump level was
> introduced in place of number_of_cpusets with the commit 664eeddeef65
> ("mm: page_alloc: use jump labels to avoid checking number_of_cpusets")
> . This fixes the problem so that cpusets_enabled() returns positive even
> for the root cpuset.
>
> Fixes: 664eeddeef65 ("mm: page_alloc: use jump labels to avoid")
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
This needs to go upstream separately, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists