[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130184908.GB28444@krava>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:49:08 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, rui.teng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix topology test on systems with sparse CPUs
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
SNIP
> + ret = build_cpu_topo(tp, cpu);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> }
> +
> +out_free:
> + cpu_map__put(map);
> if (ret) {
> free_cpu_topo(tp);
> tp = NULL;
> }
> +out:
> return tp;
> }
>
> @@ -575,7 +579,7 @@ static int write_cpu_topology(int fd, struct perf_header *h __maybe_unused,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto done;
>
> - for (j = 0; j < perf_env.nr_cpus_avail; j++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < perf_env.nr_cpus_online; j++) {
so basically we're changing from avail to online cpus
have you checked all the users of this FEATURE
if such change is ok?
I can't find any after quick search, but it would be
good to be sure and mention that in changelog
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists