[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130200858.GA10490@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:09:00 -0800
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
To: takafumi-sslab <takafumi.kubota1012@...ab.ics.keio.ac.jp>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, clm@...com, jbacik@...com,
dsterba@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fdmanana@...e.com,
naota@...sp.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: add another missing end_page_writeback on
submit_extent_page failure
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:12:31PM +0900, takafumi-sslab wrote:
> Thanks for your replying.
>
> I understand this bug is more complicated than I expected.
> I classify error cases under submit_extent_page() below
>
> A: ENOMEM error at btrfs_bio_alloc() in submit_extent_page()
> I first assumed this case and sent the mail.
> When bio_ret is NULL, submit_extent_page() calls btrfs_bio_alloc().
> Then, btrfs_bio_alloc() may fail and submit_extent_page() returns -ENOMEM.
> In this case, bio_endio() is not called and the page's writeback bit
> remains.
> So, there is a need to call end_page_writeback() in the error handling.
>
> B: errors under submit_one_bio() of submit_extent_page()
> Errors that occur under submit_one_bio() handles at bio_endio(), and
> bio_endio() would call end_page_writeback().
>
> Therefore, as you mentioned in the last mail, simply adding
> end_page_writeback() like my last email and commit 55e3bd2e0c2e1 can
> conflict in the case of B.
> To avoid such conflict, one easy solution is adding PageWriteback() check
> too.
>
> How do you think of this solution?
(sorry for the late reply.)
I think its caller, "__extent_writepage", has covered the above case
by setting page writeback again.
Thanks,
-liubo
>
> Sincerely,
>
> On 2016/12/22 15:20, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:41:50PM +0900, Takafumi Kubota wrote:
> > > This is actually inspired by Filipe's patch(55e3bd2e0c2e1).
> > >
> > > When submit_extent_page() in __extent_writepage_io() fails,
> > > Btrfs misses clearing a writeback bit of the failed page.
> > > This causes the false under-writeback page.
> > > Then, another sync task hangs in filemap_fdatawait_range(),
> > > because it waits the false under-writeback page.
> > >
> > > CPU0 CPU1
> > >
> > > __extent_writepage_io()
> > > ret = submit_extent_page() // fail
> > >
> > > if (ret)
> > > SetPageError(page)
> > > // miss clearing the writeback bit
> > >
> > > sync()
> > > ...
> > > filemap_fdatawait_range()
> > > wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> > > // wait the false under-writeback page
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Takafumi Kubota <takafumi.kubota1012@...ab.ics.keio.ac.jp>
> > > ---
> > > fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > > index 1e67723..ef9793b 100644
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> > > @@ -3443,8 +3443,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int __extent_writepage_io(struct inode *inode,
> > > bdev->bio, max_nr,
> > > end_bio_extent_writepage,
> > > 0, 0, 0, false);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > SetPageError(page);
> > > + end_page_writeback(page);
> > > + }
> > OK...this could be complex as we don't know which part in
> > submit_extent_page gets the error, if the page has been added into bio
> > and bio_end would call end_page_writepage(page) as well, so whichever
> > comes later, the BUG() in end_page_writeback() would complain.
> >
> > Looks like commit 55e3bd2e0c2e1 also has the same problem although I
> > gave it my reviewed-by.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -liubo
> >
> > > cur = cur + iosize;
> > > pg_offset += iosize;
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Keio University
> System Software Laboratory
> Takafumi Kubota
> takafumi.kubota1012@...ab.ics.keio.jp
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists