[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130054252.GB6156@yury-N73SV>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:12:52 +0530
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>,
Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
"Adam Borowski" <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
"Steve Ellcey" <sellcey@...iumnetworks.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@...glemail.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"Bamvor Zhangjian" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
<manuel.montezelo@...il.com>, <linyongting@...wei.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +0530, Yury Norov wrote:
> This series enables aarch64 with ilp32 mode.
>
> As supporting work, it introduces ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T configuration
> option that is enabled for existing 32-bit architectures but disabled
> for new arches (so 64-bit off_t is is used by new userspace). Also it
> deprecates getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls prior to prlimit64.
>
> This version is based on linux-next from 2017-01-09. It works with
> glibc-2.25, and tested with LTP, glibc testsuite, trinity, lmbench,
> CPUSpec.
>
> This is not RFC anymore. I believe that all ABI and implementation
> issues are resolved now. The way that kernel clears registers top
> halves is probably the last question, and because there's no objection
> for current approach for more that 6 month, I think, community agrees
> with it.
>
> Patches 1, 2, 3 and 8 are general, and may be applied separately.
>
> Current version does not introduce ABI changes comparing to RFC3.
> Kernel and GLIBC trees:
> https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-2017-01-09
> https://github.com/norov/glibc/tree/dev9
Hi Arnd, Catalin,
Is there any progress with review? I particularly ask about generic
patches (1-3, 8). They all reviewed, and most of them acked by you,
but they are still not upstreamed.
Yury
Powered by blists - more mailing lists