[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130235834.GC7942@bbox>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:58:34 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <mhocko@...e.com>,
<riel@...hat.com>, <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
<anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>, <shashim@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: vmpressure: fix sending wrong events on underflow
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:43:37PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> At the end of a window period, if the reclaimed pages
> is greater than scanned, an unsigned underflow can
> result in a huge pressure value and thus a critical event.
> Reclaimed pages is found to go higher than scanned because
> of the addition of reclaimed slab pages to reclaimed in
> shrink_node without a corresponding increment to scanned
> pages. Minchan Kim mentioned that this can also happen in
> the case of a THP page where the scanned is 1 and reclaimed
> could be 512.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Thanks for the fix up!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists