[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170130220119.GD31134@builder>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:01:19 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Move rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del()
On Mon 23 Jan 17:48 PST 2017, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in
> rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of
> in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking
> around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the
> rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>
I moved the rproc_delete_debug_dir() below the list_del() region to
allow reuse of the critical region in the upcoming "deleted" patch.
Applied, thank you.
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 953ee29..78200a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>
> dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name);
>
> - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> -
> idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids);
>
> if (rproc->index >= 0)
> @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
> if (rproc->auto_boot)
> rproc_shutdown(rproc);
>
> + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
> +
> /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
> mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> list_del(&rproc->node);
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists