[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <588FDB63.2080105@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:33:39 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, hl@...k-chips.com,
tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de, chanwoo@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PM / devfreq: Add suspend frequency support
Hi Viresh,
On 2017년 01월 30일 13:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>> @@ -620,6 +620,23 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>> goto err_init;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Get the suspend frequency from OPP table. But the devfreq device
>> + * using passive governor don't need to get the suspend frequency
>> + * because the passive devfreq device depend on the parent devfreq
>> + * device.
>> + */
>> + devfreq->suspend_freq = 0L;
>> + if (strncmp(devfreq->governor_name, "passive", 7)) {
>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(dev);
>> + if (opp)
>> + devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
>
> The interface has changed a bit recently. Can you please use below
> function instead ?
I knew. This patch posted before applying your patch.
>
> dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq()
This patch has not yet reviewed by devfreq maintainer.
So, I'm just waiting the review.
But, this patch is wrong on latest opp patches.
I'll fix it and resend it.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists