[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170131081329.GE6881@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:13:29 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 60/60] staging: lustre: libcfs: fix minimum size check
for libcfs ioctl
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:25:22AM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
> This sounds like a separate patch. I will open a ticket about this and
> your comments below.
There are a some other places that need a size requirement like
LNetCtl().
It really feels like it should be a part of this patch because this
patch is introducing a security breakage and it's just fixing a normal
bug.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists