[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPczttCexd4ZGHEFj=4-6a=9t1VsEmovPGmFFYHv1e5ZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:30:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Inki Dae <daeinki@...il.com>
Cc: Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, robh@...nel.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@...sung.com>,
Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] drm/panel: Add support for S6E3HA2 panel driver on
TM2 board
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Inki Dae <daeinki@...il.com> wrote:
> 2017-01-31 19:01 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017년 01월 31일 18:22에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017년 01월 24일 10:50에 Hoegeun Kwon 이(가) 쓴 글:
>>>>>> Dear Thierry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please review this patch?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thierry, I think this patch has been reviewed enough but no comment from you. Seems you are busy. I will pick up this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Comments from v8 were not resolved and I think we are waiting for v9:
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/11/178
>>>>
>>>> If that is not correct then please clarify.
>>>
>>> Seems you pointed to change te-gpios bindings to optional. right?
>>>
>>> I thought Rob left ack so it's no problem.
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/13/626
>>
>> Yes, change them to optional. I think it is a problem (regardless of
>> Rob's ack) because you are merging a driver requiring a property which
>> soon you want to remove. If you merge it (like this) removal of
>> te-gpios property will be breakage of ABI. This is not a serious
>> problem but knowing such plan of te-gpios removal upfront, it would be
>> wrong to commit such driver.
>
> This is a trivial thing so it doesn't make breakage of ABI because the
> property, te-gpios, is *optional*.
So why bindings document is not changed?
+Required properties:
(...)
+ - te-gpios: a GPIO spec for the tearing effect synchronization signal
+ gpio pin (active high)
Andrzej pointed this out and it is not fixed since then. What is the
problem with fixing the bindings documentation?
> Anyway, this wouldn't be *the things* Thierry mentioned.
Probably not, I did not respond to Thierry's feedback.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists