[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170131014813.15220-1-robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:48:13 +1300
From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: never specify a sample period for virtualized in_tx_cp counters
pmc_reprogram_counter() always sets a sample period based on the value of
pmc->counter. However, hsw_hw_config() rejects sample periods less than
2^31 - 1. So for example, a KVM guest doing
perf stat -e r2005101c4 sleep 0
will count some conditional branch events, deschedule the task, reschedule
the task, try to restore the guest PMU state for the task, in the host
reach pmc_reprogram_counter() with nonzero pmc->count, trigger EOPNOTSUPP
in hsw_hw_config(), print "kvm_pmu: event creation failed" in
pmc_reprogram_counter(), and silently (from the guest's point of view) stop
counting events.
We fix event counting by forcing attr.sample_period to always be zero for
in_tx_cp counters. Sampling doesn't work, but it already didn't work and
can't be fixed without major changes to the approach in hsw_hw_config().
Signed-off-by: Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 06ce377..af993d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -113,12 +113,18 @@ static void pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type,
.config = config,
};
+ attr.sample_period = (-pmc->counter) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
+
if (in_tx)
attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX;
- if (in_tx_cp)
+ if (in_tx_cp) {
+ /* HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED is not supported with nonzero
+ * period. Just clear the sample period so at least
+ * allocating the counter doesn't fail.
+ */
+ attr.sample_period = 0;
attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED;
-
- attr.sample_period = (-pmc->counter) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
+ }
event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
intr ? kvm_perf_overflow_intr :
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists