[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170131132541.GF4491@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:25:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf tools: Increase index if
perf_evsel__new_idx() succeeded
Em Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:38:31PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
The title of this patch is misleading, ambiguous. It leads one to have
doubt if we were not incrementing that index before and now we are,
after successfully calling perf_evsel__new_idx().
It should have been:
"perf tools: Only increase index if perf_evsel__new_idx() succeeds"
- Arnaldo
> ---
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index 87a3e5a..ac47c12 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -311,10 +311,11 @@ __add_event(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
>
> event_attr_init(attr);
>
> - evsel = perf_evsel__new_idx(attr, (*idx)++);
> + evsel = perf_evsel__new_idx(attr, *idx);
> if (!evsel)
> return NULL;
>
> + (*idx)++;
> evsel->cpus = cpu_map__get(cpus);
> evsel->own_cpus = cpu_map__get(cpus);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists