lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:33:29 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> cc: x86@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Erik Veijola <erik.veijola@...el.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Make timer handling more robust On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > +static void mce_start_timer(struct timer_list *t) > { > unsigned long iv = check_interval * HZ; > > if (mca_cfg.ignore_ce || !iv) > return; > > - per_cpu(mce_next_interval, cpu) = iv; > - > - t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + iv); > - add_timer_on(t, cpu); > + this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, iv); > + __start_timer(t, jiffies + iv); Bah. That's wrong. Delta patch below: --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ static void mce_start_timer(struct timer return; this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, iv); - __start_timer(t, jiffies + iv); + __start_timer(t, iv); } static void __mcheck_cpu_setup_timer(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists