[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170131145313.GY20076@art_vandelay>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:53:13 -0500
From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
To: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/24] drm/rockchip: dw-mipi-dsi: don't assume buffer
is aligned
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:56:18AM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:08:11 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 01:24:30PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> > > By dereferencing the MIPI command buffer as a u32* we rely on it being
> > > correctly aligned on ARM, but this may not be the case. Copy it into a
> > > stack variable that will be correctly aligned.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > - Add Chris' Reviewed-by
> > > Unchanged in v2
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > > index 03fc096fe1bd..ddbc037e7ced 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > > @@ -607,10 +607,10 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_short_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> > > static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> > > const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
> > > {
> > > - const u32 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> > > - int len = msg->tx_len, pld_data_bytes = sizeof(*tx_buf), ret;
> > > + const u8 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> > > + int len = msg->tx_len, pld_data_bytes = sizeof(u32), ret;
> > > u32 hdr_val = GEN_HDATA(msg->tx_len) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> > > - u32 remainder = 0;
> > > + u32 remainder;
> > > u32 val;
> > >
> > > if (msg->tx_len < 3) {
> > > @@ -621,12 +621,14 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> > >
> > > while (DIV_ROUND_UP(len, pld_data_bytes)) {
> > > if (len < pld_data_bytes) {
> > > + remainder = 0;
> > > memcpy(&remainder, tx_buf, len);
> > > dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA, remainder);
> > > len = 0;
> > > } else {
> > > - dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA, *tx_buf);
> > > - tx_buf++;
> > > + memcpy(&remainder, tx_buf, pld_data_bytes);
> > > + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA, remainder);
> > > + tx_buf += pld_data_bytes;
> > > len -= pld_data_bytes;
> > > }
> >
> >
> > You can clean this up further by removing a couple of the locals, the
> > conditional and the division:
> >
> > while(len < msg->tx_len) {
> > size_t to_write = MIN(msg->tx_len - len, sizeof(remainder));
> >
> > memcpy(&remainder, msg->tx_buf + len, to_write);
> > dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA, remainder);
> > len += to_write;
> >
> > ...
> > }
>
> That's a nice simplification, but it's more than I was trying to do with
> this patch. I can add a cleanup patch on top to simplify the function,
> but I don't have that much time to spend on this at the moment and I'd
> rather not block this fix because the original code structure could be
> improved.
Ok. I'm inclined to argue that writing your response probably took more time
than the copy/paste to fix it, but *shrug*.
Sean
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
Powered by blists - more mailing lists