[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170131123214.7a42eceb@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:32:14 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf tools: Create for_each_event macro for
tracepoints iteration
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:23:48 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:21:16AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:38:28PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> > > - while ((dent = readdir(dir))) {
> > > - if (dent->d_type != DT_DIR ||
> > > - strcmp(dent->d_name, ".") == 0 ||
> > > - strcmp(dent->d_name, "..") == 0 ||
> > > - strcmp(dent->d_name, "ftrace") == 0 ||
> > > + for_each_event(dir, dent, tps) {
> > > + if (!strcmp(dent->d_name, "ftrace") ||
> > > !system_in_tp_list(dent->d_name, tps))
> > > continue;
>
> > the existing style was == 0, you switched it to !, equivalent, but
> > gratuitous, keeping the existing style would make reviewing slightly
> > faster, as the pattern wouldn't have changed.
>
> Here it is:
>
> - while ((dent = readdir(dir))) {
> - if (dent->d_type != DT_DIR ||
> - strcmp(dent->d_name, ".") == 0 ||
> - strcmp(dent->d_name, "..") == 0 ||
> - strcmp(dent->d_name, "ftrace") == 0 ||
> + for_each_event(dir, dent, tps) {
> + if (strcmp(dent->d_name, "ftrace") == 0 ||
> !system_in_tp_list(dent->d_name, tps))
> continue;
Thanks, because I always screw up the !strcmp(). Thus I find the "== 0"
to me is easier to process "matches" and "!= 0" is "doesn't match".
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists