[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170131.125112.287960842388784953.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:51:12 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sainath.grandhi@...el.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mahesh@...dewar.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/7] tap: Extending tap device create/destroy APIs
From: Sainath Grandhi <sainath.grandhi@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:12:00 -0800
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(tap_major, tmp, &major_list, next) {
> + if (tap_major->major == major) {
> + return tap_major;
> + }
> + }
Single line basic blocks, such as this 'if' statement, should not be
surrounded by curly braces.
Also I see not mutual exclusion being implemented to protect this
list. If there is, it is not obvious, so it should be documented with
a comment explaining what protects the list.
> @@ -1175,14 +1228,7 @@ int tap_create_cdev(struct cdev *tap_cdev,
> if (err)
> goto out2;
>
> - macvtap_major.major = MAJOR(*tap_major);
> -
> - idr_init(&macvtap_major.minor_idr);
> - mutex_init(&macvtap_major.minor_lock);
> -
> - macvtap_major.device_name = device_name;
> -
> - return err;
> + return tap_list_add(*tap_major, device_name);
>
> out2:
> unregister_chrdev_region(*tap_major, TAP_NUM_DEVS);
If tap_list_add() fails, you will leave the chrdev region registered.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists