linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] efi: Pass secure boot mode to kernel [ver #7]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu97mxVv+CvvdwTZfXgWMnnZDJNseyX58N2xMH4dcNV9Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:20:45 +0000
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] efi: Pass secure boot mode to kernel [ver #7]

On 31 January 2017 at 17:04, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> Could you please resend with the [ver #7] removed from the subject
>> lines? It is a bit tedious to have to manually modify each patch when
>> applying.
>

This looks mostly fine to me (modulo the DeployedMode patch I just
replied to) but Matt needs to look at the x86 bits.