[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170201100807.GM2206@mai>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:08:07 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] arm64: arm_arch_timer: remove fsl-a008585 parameter
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:19:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>
> Having a command line option to flip the errata handling for a
> particular erratum is a little bit unusual, and it's vastly superior to
> pass this in the DT. By common consensus, it's best to kill off the
> command line parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
> [Mark: split patch, reword commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> ---
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists