linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: pressure: mpl3115: do not rely on structure field ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2936f505-79d9-340e-4454-ec7ef0bc7236@axentia.se>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:18:20 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
        Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@...rot.com>,
        Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>,
        Ken Lin <ken.lin@...antech.com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: pressure: mpl3115: do not rely on structure
 field ordering

On 2017-02-01 10:57, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
>>> -  		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
>>> 			BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>>> +  		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
>>> 			BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>>> as originally intended
>>
>> I considered that option, but the code in mpl3115_read_raw (and
>> mpl115_read_raw for that matter) return constants fro these values which
>> to me indicated that they were not "separate" and as that would also be
>> the change which replicated the exact behavior from before the regression
>> I went with that. But I don't care either way, so I can re-spin if you
>> want me to? (But don't blame me if that regresses in some other
>> interesting way).
> 
> no, all good; shared_by_type is the way to go
> I'd rather respin for the not ORed comment in the patch

Ok, but I think I'll wait a bit so that Ken Lin gets some time to verify
that it actually solves the original problem. It should, but...

Cheers,
peda