lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170201022032.GB17308@dtor-ws> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:20:32 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: make use of for_each_node_by_name() instead of open-coding it On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:54:37PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Instead of manually coding the loop with of_find_node_by_name(), let's > switch to the standard macro for iterating over nodes with given name. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_rdb.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc836x_mds.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c | 3 +-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/setup.c | 3 +-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spider-pic.c | 3 +-- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/feature.c | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c > index bb7b25acf26f..1e92f806ee60 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_mds.c > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void __init mpc832x_sys_setup_arch(void) > par_io_init(np); > of_node_put(np); > > - for (np = NULL; (np = of_find_node_by_name(np, "ucc")) != NULL;) > + for_each_node_by_name(np. "ucc") Gah, kbuild robot even told me about this typo and I missed it. Please let me know if you can fix up or if I should resend (or drop). I'd rather it not get dropped as I want to convert of_find_node_by_name() to stop dropping reference to the starting node, as half of the users do not expect it. Thanks. -- Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists