[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANqRtoQJaRK7Kys-fudyxJuojBmZyXMsNoDudSt4p=gj5srviA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:45:35 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] arm64: defconfig: Enlarge CMA alignment to 2 MiB
Hi Geert,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> Some IOMMUs (e.g. Renesas IPMMU/VMSA) support only page sizes of 4 KiB,
> 2 MiB, and 1 GiB.
>
> With the default setting of CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT = 8, allocations larger
> than 1 MiB are aligned to a 1 MiB boundary only. Hence a 2 MiB
> allocation may not be aligned, leading to a mapping of 512 4 KiB pages.
>
> Increase CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT to allow mapping a 2 MiB buffer using a
> single PTE, decreasing memory usage and TLB pressure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> Is this useful?
>
> Should there instead be different defaults in Kconfig, depending on
> enabled platform support?
I think there is a dependency on the kernel page size configuration as
well. In case of 16 KiB or 64 KiB page size configuration other large
page sizes may be required.
Thanks,
/ magnus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists