[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23750.1485961217@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:00:17 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] efi: Handle secure boot from UEFI-2.6 [ver #7]
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> From the OS pov, UserMode and DeployedMode are the same, the only
> difference being that AuditMode may be entered from UserMode simply by
> setting the variable to 0x1 (which can only be done before
> ExitBootServices()). And since AuditMode implies SetupMode (according
> to the diagram), you are right that we don't need to care about
> AuditMode either. AFAICT, that makes the entire patch unnecessary, so
> let's drop it for now.
Okay, in that case, do you want me to reissue and place a signed tag on my
patchset without that patch, or can you pull the other patches individually?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists