[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170201163358.GG8177@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:33:58 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shankerd@...eaurora.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 12:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Given that all ARMv8 CPUs can support SW_PAN, it is more likely to be
> > enabled than the ARMv8.1 PAN. I'd vote for supporting the workaround in
> > that case too, and hope that people do enable the HW version.
>
> Okay, I'll do my best to add support for the SW PAN case. I rebased and
> submitted v6 of the E1009 patch [1] so that it no longer depends on this
> patch landing first, if you all are inclined to pick it up while work on
> this E1003 patch continues.
The alternative is not enabling SW_PAN (at runtime) if this errata is
present, along with a warning stating that hardware-PAN should be
enabled in kconfig instead. Not sure what distributions will make of that
though.
> 1. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9547923/
Yup, I queued that one locally and I'll push to -next tomorrow.
Thanks,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists