[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170201164030.2379546-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:40:19 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC v2] sched: make DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() work with clang
Building with clang, we get a warning for each use of COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK, e.g.:
block/blk-exec.c:103:29: warning: variable 'wait' is uninitialized when used within its own initialization [-Wuninitialized]
include/linux/completion.h:61:58: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK'
include/linux/completion.h:34:29: note: expanded from macro 'COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK'
This seems to be a problem in clang, but it's relatively easy to work around
by changing the assignment.
I filed a bug against clang for the warning, but if we want to support old versions,
we may want this change as well.
I have not yet checked if the new version produces worse object code.
Link: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31829
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
v2: send the correct patch
---
include/linux/completion.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/completion.h b/include/linux/completion.h
index 5d5aaae3af43..fa5d3efaba56 100644
--- a/include/linux/completion.h
+++ b/include/linux/completion.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct completion {
{ 0, __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER((work).wait) }
#define COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(work) \
- ({ init_completion(&work); work; })
+ (*init_completion(&work))
/**
* DECLARE_COMPLETION - declare and initialize a completion structure
@@ -70,10 +70,11 @@ struct completion {
* This inline function will initialize a dynamically created completion
* structure.
*/
-static inline void init_completion(struct completion *x)
+static inline struct completion *init_completion(struct completion *x)
{
x->done = 0;
init_waitqueue_head(&x->wait);
+ return x;
}
/**
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists