lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h94drfyd.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:14:34 +0000
From:   Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, timur@...eaurora.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: Use __tlbi() macros in KVM code

Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:02:43PM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:52:31AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> >> > Refactor the KVM code to use the __tlbi macros, which will allow an errata
>> >> > workaround that repeats tlbi dsb sequences to only change one location.
>> >> > This is not intended to change the generated assembly and comparing before
>> >> > and after vmlinux objdump shows no functional changes.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
>> >> 
>> >> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > Thanks, I'll queue this one via arm64.
>> 
>> I just noticed this patch but there's been a similar patch from Mark
>> that I've been carrying as part of the KVM TLB monitoring series[0].
>> 
>> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu/msg09359.html
>
> Well I've already queued the one from Christopher. It's weird that Mark's
> version appears to miss the local VMID case (but it does have the
> flush_icache_all I wanted :).
>
> Anyway, I'm not reverting anything, so you'll need to rebase when this
> lot lands in mainline.

Sure. I'll drop the patch the next time around.

The patch is unrelated to that series and should've gone in when
we introduced the __tlbi() macro but got left out somehow.

>
> Will
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ