lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i=h_OBFyUfWhCXk7pyZZFafQjowrmx4LeHm_E9TOrEnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:48:08 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Radix tree range entries

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> Hi Dan, Konstantin,
>
> You've been interested in using range entries in the radix tree rather
> than higher-order entries.  I've built a range entry interface on top
> of our current radix tree substrate, and it seems to be behaving itself
> in the test suite.  Would you care to try out this patch?  Ideas for
> other tests to add to the test suite would be appreciated too.
>
> There may be some minor conflicts with the current Linus tree; the full
> patch series can be found here:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/shortlog/refs/heads/idr-20170131
>
> commit b6444c0557bc1ac5add3c8db66d26a7ba7ccd6a6
> Author: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> Date:   Tue Jan 31 11:16:47 2017 -0500
>
>     radix-tree: Add range entry support
>
>     We have a confirmed customer in the shape of devm_memremap_pages(), so
>     add support for range entries.  The documentation lists caveats on their
>     use, but none of these caveats apply to the one user.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>

Thanks, I'll take a look. This will let me get rid of the order_at()
hack I have in devm_memremap_pages(). I assume there's no requirement
that 'start' be aligned to 'len' when calling
radix_tree_insert_range()?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ