lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <762e1210e12fbc693b3d0e27361df53f@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:15:01 -0800
From:   Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        tsoni@...cinc.com, pfay@....qualcomm.com
Subject: irq_work_run called from armv8pmu_handle_irq

Hi All,

we would like to understand why irq_work_run() is getting called from 
armv8pmu_handle_irq() irq handler for arm SoC.

Is this irq_work frame work designed to run works from ARMPMU irq 
handlers?  If there are no of drivers using the IRQ WORK frame work,  we 
may see that ARMPMU irq handler taking long time, right?

-Thanks, Prasad

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ