[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWnJbN=65D8PAxe7B_kBf7+Ay2M59T8brF0aXkfEbgnPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:51:46 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 22:19 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>>
>> The context is process context (TX path before hitting qdisc), and
>> BH is not disabled, so in_interrupt() doesn't catch it. Hmm, this
>> makes me thinking maybe we really need to disable BH in this
>> case for nf_hook()? But it is called in RX path too, and BH is
>> already disabled there.
>
> ipt_do_table() and similar netfilter entry points disable BH.
>
> Maybe it is done too late.
I think we need a fix like the following one for minimum impact.
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 727b6fd..eee7d63 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1720,12 +1720,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_enable_timestamp);
void net_disable_timestamp(void)
{
#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
- if (in_interrupt()) {
- atomic_inc(&netstamp_needed_deferred);
- return;
- }
-#endif
+ atomic_inc(&netstamp_needed_deferred);
+#else
static_key_slow_dec(&netstamp_needed);
+#endif
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_disable_timestamp);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists