linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1702012145180.29670@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:52:44 +0100 (CET)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:46:08AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Here's v4, based on linux-next/master.  Mostly minor changes this time,
> > primarily due to Petr's v3 comments.
> 
> So far, the only review comments have been related to the first patch,
> of which I just posted an updated version.

Yes, I'm really sorry about that. I'm going through the main patch of the 
series (13/15) and it's slow to explore all details. I know Petr is in the 
process too (and I think he has found some issues. He'll speak up.).
 
> If there are no more comments, it would be great to get these patches in
> for the 4.11 merge window.  Any objections to that?

That would be nice but I don't think it's realistic. The merge window is 
quite close and we still need to finish the review and get some Acks - 
at least arch maintainers and PeterZ and/or Ingo for rq lock.

It would be great to keep in next- for a while (one cycle) too.

Miroslav