[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3671618-eab3-7597-eebb-f46fefbac12a@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:43:19 -0800
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration
crashes
On 02/01/2017 02:40 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> On 02/01/2017 02:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> Warnings of the following form occur because scsi reuses a devt number
>>> while the block layer still has it referenced as the name of the bdi
>>> [1]:
>>>
>>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 93 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
>>> sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/virtual/bdi/8:192'
>>> [..]
>>> Call Trace:
>>> dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
>>> __warn+0xcb/0xf0
>>> warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
>>> ? kernfs_path_from_node+0x4f/0x60
>>> sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
>>> sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x77/0x90
>>> kobject_add_internal+0xb2/0x350
>>> kobject_add+0x75/0xd0
>>> device_add+0x15a/0x650
>>> device_create_groups_vargs+0xe0/0xf0
>>> device_create_vargs+0x1c/0x20
>>> bdi_register+0x90/0x240
>>> ? lockdep_init_map+0x57/0x200
>>> bdi_register_owner+0x36/0x60
>>> device_add_disk+0x1bb/0x4e0
>>> ? __pm_runtime_use_autosuspend+0x5c/0x70
>>> sd_probe_async+0x10d/0x1c0
>>> async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x170
>>>
>>> This is a brute-force fix to pass the devt release information from
>>> sd_probe() to the locations where we register the bdi,
>>> device_add_disk(), and unregister the bdi, blk_cleanup_queue().
>>>
>>> Thanks to Omar for the quick reproducer script [2]. This patch survives
>>> where an unmodified kernel fails in a few seconds.
>>
>> What is the patch against? Doesn't seem to apply cleanly for me on
>> master, nor the 4.11 block tree.
>>
>
> I built it on top of Jan's bdi fixes series [1]. I can rebase to
> block/for-next, just let me know which patches you want to take first.
>
> [1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=148586843819160&w=2
Ah, no that's fine, we'll just pull Jan's stuff in first. Makes sense.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists