[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12ceba49-5465-072c-1770-b57d265bee86@milecki.pl>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 00:06:44 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
To: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zac Schroff <zschroff@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug
On 02/01/2017 11:39 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> From: Zac Schroff <zschroff@...adcom.com>
>
> Fix a bug in the 'bgmac' driver init sequence that blind writes for init
> sequence where it should preserve most bits other than the ones it is
> deliberately manipulating.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zac Schroff <zschroff@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
> Fixes: f6a95a24957 ("net: ethernet: bgmac: Add platform device support")
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c | 10 +++++++---
> include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> index 6f736c1..9bbe05c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> @@ -61,15 +61,19 @@ static bool platform_bgmac_clk_enabled(struct bgmac *bgmac)
>
> static void platform_bgmac_clk_enable(struct bgmac *bgmac, u32 flags)
> {
> - bgmac_idm_write(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL,
> - (BCMA_IOCTL_CLK | BCMA_IOCTL_FGC | flags));
> + u32 regval;
> +
> + /* Some bits of BCMA_IOCTL set by HW/ATF & should not change */
> + regval = bgmac_idm_read(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL) & BCMA_IOCTL_DO_NOT_MODIFY;
> + regval |= ((flags & (~BCMA_IOCTL_DO_NOT_MODIFY)) | BCMA_IOCTL_CLK);
You don't need these braces around whole calculation.
This should work the same:
(flags & (~BCMA_IOCTL_DO_NOT_MODIFY)) | BCMA_IOCTL_CLK
> + bgmac_idm_write(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL, regval | BCMA_IOCTL_FGC);
> bgmac_idm_read(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL);
>
> bgmac_idm_write(bgmac, BCMA_RESET_CTL, 0);
> bgmac_idm_read(bgmac, BCMA_RESET_CTL);
> udelay(1);
>
> - bgmac_idm_write(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL, (BCMA_IOCTL_CLK | flags));
> + bgmac_idm_write(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL, regval);
> bgmac_idm_read(bgmac, BCMA_IOCTL);
> udelay(1);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h
> index 9986f82..41d7404 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_regs.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #define BCMA_IOCTL_CORE_BITS 0x3FFC
> #define BCMA_IOCTL_PME_EN 0x4000
> #define BCMA_IOCTL_BIST_EN 0x8000
> +#define BCMA_IOCTL_DO_NOT_MODIFY 0x7FFFFF80
This sounds like a pretty bad name.
Take a look at brcmsmac and SICF_*:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/d11.h?v=4.9#L1737
Or b43 and B43_BCMA_IOCTL_*:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h?v=4.9#L494
Both drives modify bits you marked as DO_NOT_MODIFY and they are OK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists