lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:46:23 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "morbidrsa@...il.com" <morbidrsa@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC: mpc85xx: Add T2080 l2-cache support

On 02/02/17 12:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:16:24PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>> The l2-cache controller on the T2080 SoC has similar capabilities to the
>> others already supported by the mpc85xx_edac driver. Add it to the list
>> of compatible devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
>> Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> This is a resend of a patch that got an ack[1] but didn't seem to get
>> picked up.
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=148042072225488&w=2
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Collect ack from Johannes.
>
> Whoops, my bad. Sorry about that.
>
>>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi | 1 +
>>  drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c                 | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
>> index c744569a20e1..a97296c64eb2 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t2081si-post.dtsi
>> @@ -678,5 +678,6 @@
>>  		compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller";
>>  		reg = <0xc20000 0x40000>;
>>  		next-level-cache = <&cpc>;
>> +		interrupts = <16 2 1 9>;
>>  	};
>>  };
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
>> index 8f66cbed70b7..67f7bc3fe5b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
>> @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
>>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
>>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
>>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
>> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller", },
>
> WARNING: DT compatible string "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #58: FILE: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:632:
> +       { .compatible = "fsl,t2080-l2-cache-controller", },
>
> What is checkpatch.pl trying to tell me here?
>

checpkatch.pl is confused by 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/l2cache.txt which says

- compatible    : Should include "fsl,chip-l2-cache-controller" and "cache"
                   where chip is the processor (bsc9132, npc8572 etc.)

So none of the fsl cache controllers pass the checkpatch.pl test.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ