[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1oT+yp_kP-faQMdVun7ny9gfSpby3Ae0xmEpzmuGEJCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:40:32 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
"Eremin, Dmitry" <dmitry.eremin@...el.com>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: shut up clang warnings on CLASSERT()
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
>> > index aab15d8112a4..2d5435029185 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
>> > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ do { \
>> > * value after conversion...
>> > *
>> > */
>> > -#define CLASSERT(cond) do {switch (42) {case (cond): case 0: break; } } while (0)
>> > +#define CLASSERT(cond) do {switch (42) {case (cond): case 0: default: break; } } while (0)
>
> Ugh, why not just use the in-kernel ASSERT macro instead?
We don't have one ;-)
I've done a semi-automated patch to replace CLASSERT() with the respective
BUILD_BUG_ON() now, but that patch is quite large.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists