linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  2 Feb 2017 16:41:40 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     acme@...hat.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers

'perf probe' is failing for sdt markers whose arguments has rNN
(with postfix b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers. Add renaming
logic for these registers.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
index 09a7f55..d8a8dcf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -48,10 +48,42 @@ static const struct sdt_name_reg sdt_reg_renamings[] = {
 	SDT_NAME_REG(rdx, dx),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(esi, si),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(rsi, si),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(sil, si),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(edi, di),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(rdi, di),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(dil, di),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(ebp, bp),
 	SDT_NAME_REG(rbp, bp),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(bpl, bp),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(rsp, sp),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(esp, sp),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(spl, sp),
+
+	/* rNN registers */
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r8b,  r8),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r8w,  r8),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r8d,  r8),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r9b,  r9),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r9w,  r9),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r9d,  r9),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r10b, r10),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r10w, r10),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r10d, r10),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r11b, r11),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r11w, r11),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r11d, r11),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r12b, r12),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r12w, r12),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r12d, r12),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r13b, r13),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r13w, r13),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r13d, r13),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r14b, r14),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r14w, r14),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r14d, r14),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r15b, r15),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r15w, r15),
+	SDT_NAME_REG(r15d, r15),
 	SDT_NAME_REG_END,
 };
 
@@ -88,18 +120,6 @@ int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name)
 
 	/* Copy the chars after the register name (if need be) */
 	offset = prefix_len + sdt_len;
-	if (offset < old_desc_len) {
-		/*
-		 * The orginal register name can be suffixed by 'b',
-		 * 'w' or 'd' to indicate its size; so, we need to
-		 * skip this char if we met one.
-		 */
-		char sfx = old_desc[offset];
-
-		if (sfx == 'b' || sfx == 'w'  || sfx == 'd')
-			offset++;
-	}
-
 	if (offset < old_desc_len)
 		memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len + uprobe_len,
 			old_desc + offset, old_desc_len - offset);
-- 
2.9.3