linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:37:37 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model

On Wed 2017-02-01 14:02:43, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:46:08AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Here's v4, based on linux-next/master.  Mostly minor changes this time,
> > primarily due to Petr's v3 comments.
> 
> So far, the only review comments have been related to the first patch,
> of which I just posted an updated version.
> 
> If there are no more comments, it would be great to get these patches in
> for the 4.11 merge window.  Any objections to that?

I have finished the review finally. We still need to address some
issues but I think that we are much more close now. I found only
few small problems. Othewise, the consistency handling looks pretty
consistent to me :-)

Best Regards,
Petr