[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:02:57 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 5/8] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi
contexts
On (02/01/17 11:37), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This looks fine, but I'm curious if you tested it. That is, added a
> bunch of printks to overflow the buffer. IIRC, I did it to the original
> nmi code. If you haven't you may want to just to make sure it works. I
> can also test it too if I get some time.
Hello Steven,
yes, I have tested it on my x86 box.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists