[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:12:27 -0500
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 04/13] task_isolation: add initial support
On 2/2/2017 11:13 AM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
>> case PR_GET_FP_MODE:
>> error = GET_FP_MODE(me);
>> break;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION
>> + case PR_SET_TASK_ISOLATION:
>> + error = task_isolation_set(arg2);
>> + break;
>> + case PR_GET_TASK_ISOLATION:
>> + error = me->task_isolation_flags;
>> + break;
>> +#endif
>> default:
>> error = -EINVAL;
>> break;
> It is not a very good idea to ignore the values of unused arguments; it
> prevents future their usage, as user space can pass some garbage values
> here. Check out the code for newer prctl handlers, like
> PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, PR_SET_THP_DISABLE, or PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT
> (PR_[SG]_FP_MODE is an unfortunate recent omission).
>
> The other thing is the usage of #ifdef's, which is generally avoided
> there. Also, the patch for man-pages, describing the new prctl calls, is
> missing.
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. I'll fold this into the next spin of the series!
--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists